RSS Feed
Aug 9

New Review Page

Posted on Thursday, August 9, 2012 in Explanations and Excuses, Reviews

It occurred to me several days ago that, in addition to all the dick jokes, religious and political rants, stories from my childhood, plugs for my writing, and shout outs to my friends that I do all the time on this site, I also occasionally review stuff.

Most of my reviews are for books, but I’ve also touched on some television shows, some games, several conventions and festivals, lots of beers, and even a local bar and two cities I know very well.

So I decided, why not? Why not take all of my reviews and lump them into one category so that people can come to my site and peruse all the various things which I have opined about? So now, if you look over there at the side navigation on the right, you’ll see it: a category called “Reviews”. And if you click on it, you’ll find several pages of book reviews, television reviews, festival reviews, game reviews, and beer reviews.

Strangely, I have never reviewed a movie or any music on my site. Maybe I can change that in the near future, and hook up with Rotten Tomatoes or something.

Anyway, enjoy! And yeah, I review stuff, AND I have a reasonable following on this site. So if you have something you want reviewed…. I take requests.

May 26

The End Of ‘Lost’, How Writing On The Internet Sometimes Sucks, and My Apology To Chris Cornell


I watched The End last night. The end of Lost, that is, which was appropriately titled… ‘The End’. I tend to watch television either by streaming it (like I did Lost, like I do The Office), or by watching it when it comes out on DVD. I can’t commit to sitting in front of a television for any length of time, so that’s just how I do things.

I tell you that because searching the Internet for ABC’s site last night was how I ran across a review of the Lost series finale which prompted me to write this response.

As tempted as I am, I’m not gonna cite the web site which posted this review, because the critic there doesn’t deserve any attention via a link from me. Basically, his review sucked - in a highly ironic sort of way, as I’ll explain - and hopefully, if he doesn’t get attention, he’ll just dry up and go away. That level of uninspired hyperbolic rhetoric is exactly the sort of thing which gives writers on the Internet a bad rap - people see garbage like that and can then rightfully say that the web is full of basement-dwelling hacks. And it’s critics like this guy that make it difficult for people to sieve through all the nonsense and find the cream of what the Internet can offer.

Why was his review ironic? Because he claimed that the last episode of Lost was “lazy writing.”

Now, I’m not going to say that it was the most inspired final episode of a TV series ever - I’m gonna go with the majority of critics and say the last episode of Newhart holds that distinction (with St. Elsewhere pulling in a close second). And I’m not gonna say that it was the most heart-wrenching one either - that belongs to Six Feet Under and maybe M*A*S*H. But it was damned good, bringing together all sorts of disparate elements in a satisfying and (almost) complete way. It left me speculating about what each of the survivors (and yes, there were some - exactly 14 by my count) would do after he or she got back to civilization. Or didn’t, considering that Hurley, Ben, Bernard, Rose, and Vincent the dog probably stayed behind.

The irony here, of course, is that the review by the critic in question was indeed… lazy writing.

He kept telling us that the episode was “anticlimactic” and “bad storytelling” without tangibly demonstrating what he meant. He kept insisting that there were soooo many questions still unanswered - enough to fill pages, in fact. But he did not offer a single example. And he cited the demise of this season’s main antagonist (Locke/The Smoke Monster/The Man In Black) as being contrived - although if you were paying attention, you knew that when the “light” was out, the powers that kept Smokey and Jacob alive all those millenia were rendered inert. So not only is our reviewer’s writing “lazy”, he’s also quite possibly a lazy viewer. Since Lost was a show which demanded a lot from its viewership, it becomes apparent how this critic might still have questions.

Finally, a bit more irony to close out this post: I’m sitting here, a basement-dwelling hack (OK, I’m not in a basement; I’m in my office) criticizing a critic for something that I have been guilty of myself. That’s why right now I’m compelled to apologize to Chris Cornell, lead singer of Soundgarden and Audioslave.

In 1999, Cornell released a solo album called Euphoria Morning. About that time, I was writing for a little Atlanta rag called The Atlanta Press (formerly called Poets, Artists and Madmen), and I was asked to write a music review of Cornell’s solo effort. I blasted it.

Well, not quite. But you couldn’t say my review was glowing, and although I can’t say that my review is the reason the album had somewhat lackluster sales, I feel really bad because A) most critics really liked the album and B) the reason they liked it was because it’s fucking good. At the time, though, I wasn’t impressed, and I was lazy - I didn’t take the time to listen closely enough to it to notice the Jeff Buckley influences, or Cornell’s genuine efforts to separate his sound from Soundgarden’s.

In the ensuing years, I’ve given Euphoria Morning a few more spins - including one last Monday as I was driving my son to his grandparents’ - and I am increasingly impressed by the both the music and the lyrics Cornell penned. And so it is, I hang my heavy head in shame and I offer a sincere apology to him. Chris, I’m sorry. Your solo record is really quite excellent, and I was wrong to be so lukewarm to it 10 years ago.

Now, if only the Lost critic would follow my example.

Jul 29

What I’m Thinking About, 2nd Edition

Posted on Wednesday, July 29, 2009 in Ramblings

My previous “thought process” post went over so well, you know there had to be a follow-up. Here are some more random thoughts that have occurred to me since the last post. This time, not only am I sober, but it’s 6:30 in the morning and I woke up thinking about this.

  • Does anyone else hear a frightening similarity between North Korea’s current “diplomatic” posturings and Nikita Kruschev’s “bury you” rants?
  • We need less gun control because how else will the common man defend himself against a zombie holocaust….
  • Text message I saw recently: fuckin A dude. Now, should there be a comma or not? Ah, the power of proper punctuation.
  • I don’t and never have liked Tom and Jerry cartoons. They’re sadistic and mean-spirited without being clever. On the other hand, I think sadism and mean-spiritedness can be okay as long as you’re clever.
  • You can skip class because of a hangover. You can call in sick to work if it’s too, too bad. But when your kids want breakfast, by God, you better get your hung-over ass up and make waffles.
  • It takes a certain amount of arrogance to point out how arrogant someone is.
  • Henry Louis, Bill, and Defense Secretary Robert: Just six more Gates to go!
  • Every religious person should have a crisis of faith. If your faith survives, I can guarantee it’ll be stronger.
  • A zombie holocaust could never happen, unless it took place in a nation of complacent, self-involved, lazy whiners.
  • I think I’m sometimes vulgar because my parents always told me that vulgarity was indicative of stupidity, and I’m trying to prove them wrong. Is it working? Well, fuck it.
  • I spent a lot of money on my lawn so I wouldn’t have to spend so much on toys.
  • If you’re a writer, then I recommend the movie Adaptation. A critic once said it was “Too smart to ignore but a little too smugly superior to like….” I think he missed the point.
  • With the advent of Facebook, Twitter, Digg and the like, mailing lists are becoming less important. So saying “please take me off your mailing list” just doesn’t pack the punch it used to.
  • Michael Jackson isn’t dead. Neither are Elvis and John Lennon.
  • Why does War and Peace have to be so LONG?